Finance: Long-term Commercial Real Estate Lease Contract Renewal
Long-term Commercial Real Estate Lease Contract Renewal product is built on the Luther Platform for end to end Process Operations, with leading FTSE 100 Asset Manager.
1. Executive Summary
As a leading FTSE 100 asset management company, the Investor manages many commercial properties which are leased to enterprises to use as retail outlets. The Investor reviews long-term leases periodically for their many investment properties. This is to ensure that the rent reflects the most up-to-date index values to reflect inflation and property values, and is critical to The Investor’s operations for maximum operational revenue and to comply with regulations. However, the requirement for manual intervention by multiple parties at multiple stages increases the timescale and the cost of the process, as well as introducing errors. Using Luther’s Deep Process Automation platform to streamline rent reviews, the Investor was able to reduce the cost of the process by 70%. The average lease processing time was reduced from 5 days to just 5 hours.
Investor operates the Commercial Real Estate Lease Rent Renewal process as part of the commercial real estate management value chain. This process operates across 6 teams & 10 software systems. To operate the process end-to-end, each system performs the same cycle of steps; i) send data & info to the System, ii) receive response from System, iii) compute & validate response, iv) share & store execution of step, v) evaluate & initiate next step. For reliable operations, all teams & systems involved should operate the same end-to-end Process. They often don’t! Enterprises attempt to i) set up local connectors between directly linked systems in the process, ii) Develop local operations scripts to manage the process. Both bespoke connectors and operations scripts require regular updates as teams, process operations, and systems evolve. These updates are reactive and localized, without fully considering the entire process. This leads to operational & technical challenges, which make process operations unreliable. The opportunity is providing a platform to reliably operate the end-to-end process, across all teams & systems involved.
Traditional solutions to end-to-end process operations are unreliable & expensive. Enterprise Operations are generally function-first, they continue to improve functions & systems. Processes are considered secondary. The thinking is that if we have great functions & systems, the business can operate any process! Luther's platform is designed process-first, & primarily focuses on end-to-end processes. Reliable end-to-end process operations include consistent operation, and great functions & systems. Traditionally enterprises use bespoke connectors & local operations scripts for process operations, which are fragmented, siloed, and change separately, and so are ineffective for reliable process operations. To remedy this, enterprises use automation tools. However they are ineffective at end-to-end process operations, due to their limited scope and scale, and stitching them together also doesn’t solve the problem.
Luther’s unique value for reliable end-to-end Process Operations is providing i) standard connectivity & ii) a common operations script, across all teams & software systems. Luther’s platform vertically integrates; i) distributed system technology ii) optimal resource allocation & management, iii) real time event ordering & streaming, iv) deterministic event processing & execution, for reliable end-to-end process operations. Luther’s platform does this by i) connecting systems to standard platform nodes, rather than to each other, and ii) teams & systems can change the common operations script but all teams & systems have to know & agree to the change, so all teams & systems involved operate the same end-to-end Process all the time!
To implement the platform; i) Luther’s team mapped the Process, ii) identified teams & software systems in the process, iii) allocated nodes (servers) to teams, iv) connected nodes to systems, v) set up the Platform on the nodes. vi) Investor’s team along with Luther’s team developed the Common Operations Script (code) for Process Operations, vii) the process went Live. The process can now be completed in less than one day and operational costs have been reduced by 70%.
Beyond the commercial results, this led to operational benefits in production, i) reliable operations across the end-to-end process & over time, ii) 5X smaller Ops teams, iii) real-time monitoring, iv) enforced compliance checks, v) real-time and consistent updates across all teams, vi) reduction of reconciliation. Also, technical benefits during development, i) standard dev. process so developers can focus on operations, ii) 5X smaller Dev teams, iii) standard process connectors, iv) automated infrastructure and connectors setup, v) real-time and consistent updates with the rest of operations. Ultimately, this leads to reliable end-to-end process operations!
2. The Process
Long-term Commercial Real Estate Lease Contract Rent Review process
An aspect of the Investor’s operations is reviewing the rent of long-term commercial leases. For operational reliability, financial efficiency, regulatory reporting, and to avoid incorrect leases, each step of the rent review process must be operated, documented, validated and completed effectively and consistently. To complete the rent review process, The Investor updates leases based on updated index values, and drafts an updated contract for agreement with the property manager and tenant.
The Long-term Lease Rent Renewal process has these steps; i) contract managing agent is identified, ii) managing agent is notified, iii) updated index value sourced from the Office of National Statistics, iv) Investor calculates the new rent value, v) Investor signs off and approve updated rent, vi) Investor’s lawyers generate rent review memo and send it to the tenant and property manager (PM), vii) tenant accepts updated rent, viii) PM accepts updated rent, ix) Investor finalizes updated contract, x) tenant accepts the updated contract, xi) PM accepts updated contract, xii) payment details between tenant and PM updates.
Process Operations
Different teams have different operations, rules and governance and they also utilize and operate a variety of software systems in different ways. Each system operates a specific function for the process. To operate the process end to end, each function performs the same cycle of steps: i) send data & information to the System, ii) receive response from the System, iii) compute & validate response, iv) share & store execution of step, v) evaluate & initiate next steps.
3. Opportunity
Enterprises are complex organizations operating many processes. Enterprises operate Processes across fragmented and siloed teams and software systems resulting in disjointed, inconsistent and inefficient end to end operations, leading to high costs, delays and errors.
Specifically, operating processes across fragmented and siloed teams and software systems affect process operations both technically during the development phase & operationally once they go live in production.
The teams in Insurer’s supplier claims order fulfillment process (Claims, Supplier, Finance, and Payments) are large and disjointed, and operate separately. This often leads to inefficient operations, incomplete or submitted requests or payments, payment backlogs, delays and data errors. This results in high operational costs and longer processing times. Inefficiencies and slow payment times reduce satisfaction for customers and suppliers, and Insurer risks penalties for delayed payments.
4. Traditional Solutions to end to end process operations are unreliable
Enterprises have great individual functions & teams & software systems. However, for efficient process operations, effective end-to-end operations are as important as effective functions & teams & systems.
To operate an end to end process enterprises traditionally set up projects, with i) dedicated large teams, & ii) infrastructure set up, to iii) develop application (end to end process) code, & iv) set up maintenance systems. This bespoke approach results in high operations cost & multiple technical & operational problems.
Bespoke connectors and local operations scripts & why they are unreliable
Traditional solutions for operating enterprise processes are inefficient. They have disjointed local operations that are modified and maintained by teams that own specific parts of the process. As the process changes and evolves, local operations are often modified without fully considering its impact on the rest of the end to end process operations. They also deploy local and non-standard connectors between teams directly interacting with each other in the process. For more details please visit Full Case Study
Automation tools & why stitching them together is unreliable
To attempt to remedy the inefficiencies of this approach, enterprises use automation tools such as RPA and workflow automation tools to operate the process. These tools are effective at operating local task and workflow operations, usually for 1-2 teams but do not scale to end-to-end process operations across multiple teams and software systems. This approach does not solve the problems of operational friction, inefficiencies, delays and errors. For more details please visit Full Case Study
5. Solution
Luther’s platform was used by the Insurer’s development team to build a world-class supplier claims order fulfillment process. The platform provides standard connectivity across all teams & systems, and consistent common operations script.
Implementation
This is a product built on the Luther platform using Deep Process Automation Technology to automate the operations of the Long-term Commercial Real Estate Lease Contract Renewal Process. The implementation steps included:
- Process Mapping: Luther’s team worked with Insurer teams to map the process operations.
- Identify Software Systems: Luther's team identified systems involved in the process operations.
- Assigning Nodes: Luther's team allocated dedicated (server) nodes to each team in the process
- Connectors to Software Systems: For each team, the platform connects its node to its systems
- Platform Set-up: Luther's team deployed the platform on all nodes.
- Common Operations Script for Process Operations: The Asset Manager's development team, in collaboration with Luther, developed the application code to operate the end-to-end process.
- Go Live (Production)
Luther, working with the Asset Manager's teams, mapped the process in 4 weeks & set up Platform in 1 day. Insurer’s team then worked with Luther’s team to develop process ops into a Common Operations Script in 8 weeks.
How it all comes together reliably, with the Luther Platform
Luther’s platform reliably operates the end-to-end supplier claims fulfillment process by providing a standard connectivity and common operations scripts.
6. Results
Estimated Commercial Results
Operational and Technical Results
The Luther Platform streamlines operations across enterprise processes, reducing process time and cost while maintaining transparency and flexibility.
Luther Systems
What we do and why
Luther platform Links
Find more information about Luther’s Platform Core Features here.
For a more detailed introduction to the Luther platform please visit Luther Deep Process Automation Primer
For a detailed introduction and documentation examples please see the Luther Platform website.
For more information about Luther’s platform please visit Luther Systems website.